I'm on both a pastel and sparkle nail polish fixation at the moment so this was basically the spawn of those two loves..except less creepy than how that sounds.
I used the following:
A base coat of 17 Strengthening base coat followed by two coats of the polish on the left- Max Factor "Max Effect Mini Nail Polish" in "Cool Jade". This is a nice pastel shade in the bottle but ends up a little bit darker on the nail. It streaked a little bit in places but overall only needed a second coat just to finish it.
I added an accent nail on my ring fingers in OPI "Save Me" from the Nicky Minaj collection. This polish is a clear base with small pieces of silver glitter and bars of glitter in blue/green/gold shades, so it sits nicely over the green.
Monday, 14 May 2012
Thursday, 10 May 2012
DIOR | Secret Garden - Versailles ad
I saw this ad about a week ago and had to share it, I love it so. Firstly, it's Dior, so that's one good reason to like it. Secondly, I love Depeche Mode, so pretty happy with the choice of music and lastly, it's shot in Versailles..drool. I went there with HTB a couple of years ago and we were just blown away, it's so beautiful. I have a thing for Marie Antoinette after reading Antonia Fraser's book about her (she was misunderstood..ok?!) plus I feel like we would've had a lot in common, namely; bling, cake, fancy bedspreads and shoes. So it was like heaven wandering around her former home. Here's me, settling in in the great hall of mirrors, as featured in the ad:
It's a given that the palace is beautiful but the grounds are equally stunning, also well highlighted in the ad. We had a lovely stroll around in the sun, eating ice creams before taking a boat out onto the lake (we didn't just take it, we paid for it's use first, obviously). Good times.
Wednesday, 9 May 2012
Chanel Emerveille
I mentioned Chanel's Illusion D'Ombre in "Illusoire" in a previous post and raved about it...naturally, because it is a thing of beauty. Then, the other day, I got my grubby-make-up-loving paws on "Emerveille" and had to do a post on it too. Behold:
This doesn't photograph hugely true to life, it looks mostly gold there but in reality it's a pale pink with flecks of gold running through it. And it's very pretty. I gamely tried to swatch it, this being the result:
This baby does not like to be photographed. When worn properly, it looks beautiful blended with "Illusoire", worn lightly on it's own for a subtle sheen or built up in a few layers for a proper blast of colour. It can also be used as a highlighter (I won't lie, my sister gave me that idea). Like "Illusoire", it comes in a glass pot with a very cute little Chanel brush, pictured beside it there. Chanel packaging is just so fabulous. I can't imagine this running out any time soon either, a little goes a long way and there is plenty in the pot. It's a cream eyeshadow, which means it glides on nicely with only the use of a finger, if the world's cutest brush is not to your liking. All in all, this is rather lovely.
This doesn't photograph hugely true to life, it looks mostly gold there but in reality it's a pale pink with flecks of gold running through it. And it's very pretty. I gamely tried to swatch it, this being the result:
This baby does not like to be photographed. When worn properly, it looks beautiful blended with "Illusoire", worn lightly on it's own for a subtle sheen or built up in a few layers for a proper blast of colour. It can also be used as a highlighter (I won't lie, my sister gave me that idea). Like "Illusoire", it comes in a glass pot with a very cute little Chanel brush, pictured beside it there. Chanel packaging is just so fabulous. I can't imagine this running out any time soon either, a little goes a long way and there is plenty in the pot. It's a cream eyeshadow, which means it glides on nicely with only the use of a finger, if the world's cutest brush is not to your liking. All in all, this is rather lovely.
Recently read book roundup
I've decided to do a "recently read" book round up for 2 reasons.
Firstly, individual book reviews can be long and tiresome. If it's good, you'll know about it cause it'll get it's own post (Cue much imaginary competition and grandstanding between the several stacks of books that await me), if it's bad then I can succintly (unlikely) provide you with that information and save you money, before moving onto something more interesting.
Secondly, I'm doing a "recently read" in the hopes that the pressure to do this post regularly will force me off my arse to start reading all those classics I've neglected (see: Books to Read Before Death). Maybe then I'll stop using words like "arse" and start using words like "posterior". Yes, that's what Thomas Hardy would've said.
Anyway, my most recent roundup are:
"Before I Go To Sleep" by S J Watson, "50 Shades of Grey" by E L James and "Make, Bake, Love" by Lilly Higgins.
Clearly, none of the aboves are classics but before you mock, I have grand literary plans for the rest of the Summer (I may or may not have said that every Summer prior to this).
"Before I go to Sleep" is the story of Christine, who, following a brain injury in her late 20's, now finds herself in her 40's, waking up every day with complete amnesia, remembering nothing following her injury. Throughout the day her husband fills her in on her life and by the time she goes to sleep that night, she's up to speed. Unfortunately after a prolonged sleep she forgets everything so goes through the same process every day. Kind of like Groundhog Day, except Andie McDowell is nowhere to be seen, so therefore, less annoying.
At first I found this one a little bit depressing (in fairness, it's not exactly sunshine, lollipops and rainbows material) but it picked up pace and turned into an intriguing little thriller. I thought I had the twist in the tale sussed, but I was wrong! Definitely worth a read if you like psychological thrillers but I would suggest having a lighter book on standby, like....
"50 Shades of Grey"! A New York Times number 1 Bestseller, people raving about it all over the place, claiming it's saving marriages across America..I was intrigued. That was my first mistake. My second mistake was then purchasing it.
In a nutshell, it's the story of Anastasia Steele (yes, that is her real name), a college student who interviews the young and incredibly attractive (and wealthy-that point is stressed several times) business tycoon Christian Grey for her college magazine. Anyway, he has these amazing grey eyes (also heavily mentioned throughout the book-at least on every second page) and although he appears to be a complete bastard she falls for him during the interview and within the next chapter or so agrees to become his "subservient", for the auld s & m shenanigans in his dungeon. You know, as you do. Things that annoyed me about this book (you might want a comfortable chair and a cup of tea handy for this part):
1) There's a whole long winded section in the middle where she's reading her subservient contract, which goes on for ages. Just cause it's an s&m contract doesn't make it any more interesting than a regular legal document. If I was interested in that sort of thing, I'd actually bother reading the itunes terms and conditions that they renew like every two days before you can buy anything, instead of just pretending I have. Also one large section of the contract is repeated in two different parts of the book, completely unnecessarily!! *Cough, space filler, cough*.
2) Anastasia seems to have two split personalities fighting each other continuously who help her make decisions-her "inner goddess" (whatever the hell that is) and her subconscious, although this is casually mentioned as if completely normal. Every time I saw the words "inner goddess" I actually thought I was going to punch the kindle in the face.
3) Although every so often E L James tries to portray the main character as strong and intelligent, she then ruins that by doing the following: failing to describe Anastasia's appearance in any detail, apart from the colour of her hair and the fact that she blushes all the time (of course). Whereas, Christian Grey is described in minute detail, as if the main female character is less important than the male, in appearance as in every other area. Also, every time he does something, she puts it in italics, as if it's a really big deal- "Christian Grey sent me an email!", "Christian Grey just sat down in my house!" etc. Furthermore, Anastasia's friend Jose (easily one of the most annoying characters ever-keeps saying things like "Dios Mia!" etc) turns out to be a potential rapist, which she decides to get over pretty quickly saying "Oh, I could never stay mad at you!". Ah yeah, nothing like a friend who tries to sexually assault you when you're drunk, I always say. That's another thing, she keeps saying things like "Oh my, wishes really do come true", like a Disney princess, except, obviously with more s & m. AND she keeps putting her hair in pigtails, even though she's TWENTY-TWO!!! Cue more Kindle-face punching. Basically it's like a feminist's nightmare.
The only redeeming feature for me was the rather sweet emails they send back and forth to each other which actually seemed quite realistic-like how the start of a relationship actually is. Other than that, it's pure tripe. I did get a decent chuckle or two out of it but those were unintentional laughs on the part of the author, I would imagine. Having said all of that (apologies for the rant), I can see why people are enjoying it, it's completely mindless and involves no concentration whatsover, for that reason I just bought it for my bestie for her train journey. If you're expecting it to save your marriage though, you'll be sorely disappointed. Unless you and your husband enjoy a good laugh at poorly written s & m. Which is unlikely. But then again, I don't know your life.

Lastly, "Make, Bake, Love" is a really lovely cookery book with some amazing recipes inside. It is a bit of a cheat, as I didn't technically "read" this, but you can rest assured that I have given the pictures a good lookin' over from cover to cover! Having loved her on Maeve Higgins' show "Fancy Vittles" a while back, I started following her blog (Stuff I make, bake and love) and then of course, had to pick this gorgeous book up with a gift voucher I had. The recipes are really easy to follow and the book is beautifully laid out- this would make a great present for anyone who enjoys baking.
Recipes I plan on trying out in the not too distant future include; citrus tarts, chocolate peanut butter cake, mini black forest cakes and red velvet cake. Nom nom nom.
Firstly, individual book reviews can be long and tiresome. If it's good, you'll know about it cause it'll get it's own post (Cue much imaginary competition and grandstanding between the several stacks of books that await me), if it's bad then I can succintly (unlikely) provide you with that information and save you money, before moving onto something more interesting.
Secondly, I'm doing a "recently read" in the hopes that the pressure to do this post regularly will force me off my arse to start reading all those classics I've neglected (see: Books to Read Before Death). Maybe then I'll stop using words like "arse" and start using words like "posterior". Yes, that's what Thomas Hardy would've said.
Anyway, my most recent roundup are:
"Before I Go To Sleep" by S J Watson, "50 Shades of Grey" by E L James and "Make, Bake, Love" by Lilly Higgins.
Clearly, none of the aboves are classics but before you mock, I have grand literary plans for the rest of the Summer (I may or may not have said that every Summer prior to this).
"Before I go to Sleep" is the story of Christine, who, following a brain injury in her late 20's, now finds herself in her 40's, waking up every day with complete amnesia, remembering nothing following her injury. Throughout the day her husband fills her in on her life and by the time she goes to sleep that night, she's up to speed. Unfortunately after a prolonged sleep she forgets everything so goes through the same process every day. Kind of like Groundhog Day, except Andie McDowell is nowhere to be seen, so therefore, less annoying.
At first I found this one a little bit depressing (in fairness, it's not exactly sunshine, lollipops and rainbows material) but it picked up pace and turned into an intriguing little thriller. I thought I had the twist in the tale sussed, but I was wrong! Definitely worth a read if you like psychological thrillers but I would suggest having a lighter book on standby, like....
In a nutshell, it's the story of Anastasia Steele (yes, that is her real name), a college student who interviews the young and incredibly attractive (and wealthy-that point is stressed several times) business tycoon Christian Grey for her college magazine. Anyway, he has these amazing grey eyes (also heavily mentioned throughout the book-at least on every second page) and although he appears to be a complete bastard she falls for him during the interview and within the next chapter or so agrees to become his "subservient", for the auld s & m shenanigans in his dungeon. You know, as you do. Things that annoyed me about this book (you might want a comfortable chair and a cup of tea handy for this part):
1) There's a whole long winded section in the middle where she's reading her subservient contract, which goes on for ages. Just cause it's an s&m contract doesn't make it any more interesting than a regular legal document. If I was interested in that sort of thing, I'd actually bother reading the itunes terms and conditions that they renew like every two days before you can buy anything, instead of just pretending I have. Also one large section of the contract is repeated in two different parts of the book, completely unnecessarily!! *Cough, space filler, cough*.
2) Anastasia seems to have two split personalities fighting each other continuously who help her make decisions-her "inner goddess" (whatever the hell that is) and her subconscious, although this is casually mentioned as if completely normal. Every time I saw the words "inner goddess" I actually thought I was going to punch the kindle in the face.
3) Although every so often E L James tries to portray the main character as strong and intelligent, she then ruins that by doing the following: failing to describe Anastasia's appearance in any detail, apart from the colour of her hair and the fact that she blushes all the time (of course). Whereas, Christian Grey is described in minute detail, as if the main female character is less important than the male, in appearance as in every other area. Also, every time he does something, she puts it in italics, as if it's a really big deal- "Christian Grey sent me an email!", "Christian Grey just sat down in my house!" etc. Furthermore, Anastasia's friend Jose (easily one of the most annoying characters ever-keeps saying things like "Dios Mia!" etc) turns out to be a potential rapist, which she decides to get over pretty quickly saying "Oh, I could never stay mad at you!". Ah yeah, nothing like a friend who tries to sexually assault you when you're drunk, I always say. That's another thing, she keeps saying things like "Oh my, wishes really do come true", like a Disney princess, except, obviously with more s & m. AND she keeps putting her hair in pigtails, even though she's TWENTY-TWO!!! Cue more Kindle-face punching. Basically it's like a feminist's nightmare.
The only redeeming feature for me was the rather sweet emails they send back and forth to each other which actually seemed quite realistic-like how the start of a relationship actually is. Other than that, it's pure tripe. I did get a decent chuckle or two out of it but those were unintentional laughs on the part of the author, I would imagine. Having said all of that (apologies for the rant), I can see why people are enjoying it, it's completely mindless and involves no concentration whatsover, for that reason I just bought it for my bestie for her train journey. If you're expecting it to save your marriage though, you'll be sorely disappointed. Unless you and your husband enjoy a good laugh at poorly written s & m. Which is unlikely. But then again, I don't know your life.
Lastly, "Make, Bake, Love" is a really lovely cookery book with some amazing recipes inside. It is a bit of a cheat, as I didn't technically "read" this, but you can rest assured that I have given the pictures a good lookin' over from cover to cover! Having loved her on Maeve Higgins' show "Fancy Vittles" a while back, I started following her blog (Stuff I make, bake and love) and then of course, had to pick this gorgeous book up with a gift voucher I had. The recipes are really easy to follow and the book is beautifully laid out- this would make a great present for anyone who enjoys baking.
Recipes I plan on trying out in the not too distant future include; citrus tarts, chocolate peanut butter cake, mini black forest cakes and red velvet cake. Nom nom nom.
Sunday, 6 May 2012
Smashbox Pout
I almost gave my local pharmacist a heart attack the other day, induced by the loud exclamation coming from me after I noticed a "50% Selected Smashbox" sign on the counter. Twenty minutes of rummaging through eyeshadows, glosses, lipsticks and powders later I decided to be good and purchase this one and only lipstick, called Pout:
I can't help it, I'm drawn to Barbie brights. The packaging on this is aesthetically pleasing with a nice satisfying click upon closing and it smells like sweets- yay! The info on the box describes the formula as follows:
"Pamper your lips with rich, silky color and lasting moisturization! This innovative formula with exclusive sila-silk technology is enhanced with silica for exceptional shine and flawless application while vitamin E and Tahitian flower provide non-stop hydration and plush, cushion-like comfort."
I don't know about all this silica business or the Tahitian flower extract (so hard to get enough Tahitian flower extract in your cosmetics these days, I always say) but it does feel quite comforting on- like a slightly creamier version of Vaseline. Unfortunately, pigmentation in this is not superb, when I swatched it on on my hand in the pharmacy, I only did it lightly and the colour was faint enough but I assumed with correct application this wouldn't be a problem. Wrong.
The below swatch involved a serious amount of build up to achieve this colour and even then it wasn't as strong as the colour in the tube:
Boo. So really it's more of tinted gloss than anything (and even at that, you really have to pile it on). You live, you learn. As I was buying this, the kindly (and thankfully, well recovered) pharmacist popped in a sample of the famous Smashbox "Photo Finish Foundation Primer" too:
"Create the perfect canvas for foundation application with this silky blend of vitamins A & E, grape seed extract and green tea. Worn alone or under foundation to increase its longevity, this unique formula helps to reduce the appearance of fine lines and pores for visibly softer skin with a velvety smooth finish."
I will never understand the beauty industries' obsession with reducing pore size, it's not like there's some sort of epidemic whereby women are struggling to walk around because they're so laden down by the crater-size pores on their faces. It just seems like one more thing to try and snare women with and make them feel self conscious about so they'll buy another product they don't actually need. I've definitely been guilty in the past of buying beauty products I don't technically need but that's always been things like lip products (see above) or nail polish and that is purely because, like a magpie, I am drawn to sparkly, shiny things..I can't help it and it makes me momentarily happy, so I don't care! What does bother me is stuff like the above "reduce the appearance of pores"..a Sales Assistant in Brown Thomas stopped me recently to try to sell me a new product for reducing pore size and I said "But I have no need for that- my pores are fine" and she said "well most people think that but actually their pores do need minimizing"...what??!! Based on what research exactly?! No, just no!! Step away from the pore minimizers people! And, breath. You'll be pleased to know that during that rant I only turned green and split my pants for just a few minutes and am now back to normality.
Anyways, although this sample looks teeny, you only need a small amount for under foundation so I've used it about three times now and like it. It applies smoothly and does provide a nice base for foundation so I would use it again but probably not at the moment. I can't use this and my Clarins Bronzing Primer too-that'd be like primer overload and some sort of minor explosion might occur if I did, so I think I'll stick with the Clarins, purely because the good weather is approaching (allegedly) and I require a faint glow for that, which I won't get from the Smashbox. If however, you're looking for a good regular primer that'll increase the wear time of your foundation, this is definitely worth a go.
I'd give that particular shade of their lipstick a miss though!
I can't help it, I'm drawn to Barbie brights. The packaging on this is aesthetically pleasing with a nice satisfying click upon closing and it smells like sweets- yay! The info on the box describes the formula as follows:
"Pamper your lips with rich, silky color and lasting moisturization! This innovative formula with exclusive sila-silk technology is enhanced with silica for exceptional shine and flawless application while vitamin E and Tahitian flower provide non-stop hydration and plush, cushion-like comfort."
I don't know about all this silica business or the Tahitian flower extract (so hard to get enough Tahitian flower extract in your cosmetics these days, I always say) but it does feel quite comforting on- like a slightly creamier version of Vaseline. Unfortunately, pigmentation in this is not superb, when I swatched it on on my hand in the pharmacy, I only did it lightly and the colour was faint enough but I assumed with correct application this wouldn't be a problem. Wrong.
The below swatch involved a serious amount of build up to achieve this colour and even then it wasn't as strong as the colour in the tube:
Boo. So really it's more of tinted gloss than anything (and even at that, you really have to pile it on). You live, you learn. As I was buying this, the kindly (and thankfully, well recovered) pharmacist popped in a sample of the famous Smashbox "Photo Finish Foundation Primer" too:
"Create the perfect canvas for foundation application with this silky blend of vitamins A & E, grape seed extract and green tea. Worn alone or under foundation to increase its longevity, this unique formula helps to reduce the appearance of fine lines and pores for visibly softer skin with a velvety smooth finish."
I will never understand the beauty industries' obsession with reducing pore size, it's not like there's some sort of epidemic whereby women are struggling to walk around because they're so laden down by the crater-size pores on their faces. It just seems like one more thing to try and snare women with and make them feel self conscious about so they'll buy another product they don't actually need. I've definitely been guilty in the past of buying beauty products I don't technically need but that's always been things like lip products (see above) or nail polish and that is purely because, like a magpie, I am drawn to sparkly, shiny things..I can't help it and it makes me momentarily happy, so I don't care! What does bother me is stuff like the above "reduce the appearance of pores"..a Sales Assistant in Brown Thomas stopped me recently to try to sell me a new product for reducing pore size and I said "But I have no need for that- my pores are fine" and she said "well most people think that but actually their pores do need minimizing"...what??!! Based on what research exactly?! No, just no!! Step away from the pore minimizers people! And, breath. You'll be pleased to know that during that rant I only turned green and split my pants for just a few minutes and am now back to normality.
Anyways, although this sample looks teeny, you only need a small amount for under foundation so I've used it about three times now and like it. It applies smoothly and does provide a nice base for foundation so I would use it again but probably not at the moment. I can't use this and my Clarins Bronzing Primer too-that'd be like primer overload and some sort of minor explosion might occur if I did, so I think I'll stick with the Clarins, purely because the good weather is approaching (allegedly) and I require a faint glow for that, which I won't get from the Smashbox. If however, you're looking for a good regular primer that'll increase the wear time of your foundation, this is definitely worth a go.
I'd give that particular shade of their lipstick a miss though!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
